Worst Tank of WWII

Consider all aspects of the vehicle including crew performance and how much it contributed to whatever theater it was in.

None of the above, the T-35.

High cost, abysmal performance, and many design flaws.

The Transmission was incredibly prone to breaking, the tank couldnt climb over a hill, and would usually topple over. The Turrets would block escape hatches, so sometimes the crew would be trapped in the iron coffin. moving through rivers or other waterways would bog down the tank. This combined with the Soviets already poor Tanksman skill, made it a pretty horrible tank. The Soviets solved this by sending all remaining tanks into the Grinder at the Battle of Moscow. but over 80% of them didint even make it to the front line.

Im going with the Japs. Their tanks performed horrid and were ineffective in all campaigns. The French tanks were used ineffectively and their crews lacked aggressiveness ,but were over all decent tanks and the Italian tanks were good light tanks(but were used and considered medium tanks), were crewed well and consisted of over half of Rommels armored forces... that slapped the Brits all over North Africa.

Dr. Love wrote:None of the above, the T-35.

High cost, abysmal performance, and many design flaws.

The Transmission was incredibly prone to breaking, the tank couldnt climb over a hill, and would usually topple over. The Turrets would block escape hatches, so sometimes the crew would be trapped in the iron coffin. moving through rivers or other waterways would bog down the tank. This combined with the Soviets already poor Tanksman skill, made it a pretty horrible tank. The Soviets solved this by sending all remaining tanks into the Grinder at the Battle of Moscow. but over 80% of them didint even make it to the front line.

Thats that Jap animation looking tank. It did suck. I added it good suggestion.